Technical Analysis Review: The Golden Cross

I am by no means an expert in Technical Analysis, but I have studied it with some interest recently.  Much of the money management and academic financial community disregards technical analysis as akin to palm reading or fortune telling.  Since the works of Harry Markowitz, the academic and money management community have accepted the Efficient Market Hypothesis as law.  Anomalies are recognized, but are disregarded as just that.  Anomalies.

Technical analysis incorporates the use of history and charting in attempt to explain why a stock is moving up, down or sideways, and to use that information to glean some insight as to what it may do next.  I won't take sides on the debate, but I'll say that you are doing yourself a disservice by completely disregarding technical analysis.  Isn't it a better idea to study all methods of investing, then determine which method, or combination of methods, makes the most sense to you?

There are numerous terms and rules in technical analysis, most of which I am still not familiar.  There is one that I recently read about called the "Golden Cross" or its counterpart, the "Death Cross."  I did some analysis on the concept.  Here is my definition of the rules, and my analsysis of whether or not it is effective.

Are you familiar with moving averages?  They are a vital part of statistics and used heavily by technical analysts.  A moving average smoothes out the prices movements of a stock or index.  It is calculated by dividing the sum of recent prices by the number of days you are sampling.  You may select the number of days, and in fact, most technical analysts use a variety of moving averages from 15 days to 50 days to 200 days.  The more days you use, the longer term your analysis.  The moving average will trail the price by its very nature.  As prices are moving up, the moving average will be below the price, and when prices are moving down the moving average will land above the current price.  See the chart of AAPL on the first tab of my attached spreadsheet. Download my spreadsheet here.

One of the ways that you use the moving average information is by following a rule called the Golden Cross and the Death Cross.  Here is how it works.  When prices begin a move up, the shorter term moving average will generally begin below the longer term moving average.  So, the 50day MA will be below the 200day MA.  As the price continues its ascent, the 50day MA will cross the 200day MA and continue above it until there is a change the the price action of the stock.  The point at which the shorter term MA moves above the longer term MA is known as the Golden Cross, and is considered a buy point.  Conversely, when the 50day MA crosses the 200day MA to the downside, it is known as the Death Cross, and is considered a sell point.

Take a look at my spreadsheet.  The information is laid out as follows.  The first tab is Apple (AAPL), the pink line is the 200day MA, and the yellow line is the 50day MA.  Currently, the 50day MA is below the 200day MA.  The Death Cross, occured on June 21, 2006.  Interestingly, the stock price is down since that time.

The tab called "AAPL$" is a chart that shows the growth of a hypothetical $10,000 based on whether you used the Golden Cross/Death Cross timing method, or simply bought and held.  You can see that Buy and Hold edged out this timing method.  From January 1, 1998, your $10,000 invested in Apple would have grown to $137,068.97 if you bought and held.  During that same time period, timing the stock by using the Golden Cross/Death Cross method, your position would have grown to $128,925.26.  This also assumes that your money was in money markets while it was out of the stock.  So, you would have had less, but let's remember that you would have avoided some volatile periods, substantially reducing your standard deviation.

The same analysis was done for Krispy Kreme Donuts, Brocade, QQQQs, GE, S&P500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Russell 2000, and the NASDAQ Index.  Krispy Kreme, Brocade and the Qs did not have a long enough history to begin at 1998.  Instead I began 200 trading days after the earliest price data.

Here are the results:

AAPL (Apple Computers)
Timing:  $128,925.26  Buy and Hold: $137,068.97

KKD (Krispy Kreme Donuts)
Timing:  $11,262.92  Buy and Hold: $5,022.03

BRCD (Brocade)
Timing:  $6840.35  Buy and Hold: $735.08

QQQQ (Nasdaq 100 Trust)
Timing:  $23,315.22  Buy and Hold: $7,480.13

GE (General Electric)
Timing:  $17,336.26  Buy and Hold: $15,901.88

S&P 500 Index
Timing:  $16,629.49  Buy and Hold: $12,881.37

Dow Jones Industrial Average
Timing:  $9,350.17  Buy and Hold: $13,802.72

Russell 2000 (Small Cap Index)
Timing:  $13,319.05  Buy and Hold: $16,042.88

Nasdaq Index
Timing:  $27,082.84  Buy and Hold: $13,112.19

Bottom Line:  Clearly, it does not work all the time and for every period.  Even for some of the ones for which it worked well, there was a period at which it was lagging by a notable amount.  Would you have had the discipline and patience to continue to stick with this strategy?

At first my theory was that it works better for more volatile stocks.  That proved not true.  I think, like any timing mechanism, this works best when applied to stocks that have undergone severe price declines, even if the stock eventually recovers.

During periods of persistent price gains, all timing mechanisms fail.  This is why the generally bullish market of the 80s and 90s convinced everyone that timing the market in any form is for fools.

This one was easy to test.  Feel free to plug in another stock if you would like, and let me know how it works out.  The price data was downloaded from YahooFinance.  If you have difficulty formatting to my spreadsheet, let me know what stock you would like to test via comments.  I'll be more than happy to follow up in the comments.

And most importantly, read my disclaimer:  This is general advice. You should consult with your own financial advisor before making any major financial decisions, including investments or changes to your portfolio.  You, alone, are responsible for any losses or damages that may and will likely result from your financial decisions.

Comments

[Stocks to Buy]

I am so glad to visit this blog.

[Canada Goose Jacket]

a lot of editors have started to understand more about alternate options, they will obtained a little cameras, spend some money to hire nearby residents and individuals across the actors within the facilities

[Cheap jordans]

I am very happy to know some quality blogs still exist now that have useful information.