Last Friday, John Stossel hosted a 20/20 special report on debt in America. Admittedly, despite my reminder to the entire PF blogging community, I forgot to set my Tivo. I tuned in about 10 minutes after the show started, and picked up from there. Maybe I missed the hook at the beginning, but I was not terribly impressed by the show. In fact, I thought Oprah's Debt Diet was far more impactful.
You'll have to forgive my weak review, but Tricia at Blogging Away Debt already wrote a very comprehensive review. She said it far better than I could have. There are only two things that really jumped out at me that I thought was strange.
First, the focus on debt collectors. They spent way too much time interviewing and profiling these guys. They tried to show the "they're not all bad men" angle, and the "look how vicious they can get" side. I thought this should have been three minutes. They didn't need to go through the effort to humanize the collectors. It's not like it changes the reality of the abundant use of debt and easy credit in this country.
The Cyber-begging segment was also unnecessary. How many Americans can relate to this? A few hundred? If anything, it may have encouraged more people to give it a shot.
I did like the quick easy formula that they gave at the very end. Take your current age and divide by 2. This is the percentage of your income that you should be saving. So, at 20, you should save 10%. When you are fifty, you should be saving 25% of your income. It's obviously very simplistic, but I like the idea of a savings percent target that scales up. This encourages people to save their raises instead of just ratcheting up their spending.







Recent Comments